ادراک دانشجویان دوره کارشناسی ارشد رهبری آموزشی از کار تیمی در محیط ترکیبی ادوبی کانکت و واتساپ: پیگیری کیفی یک‌ مطالعه پیش ‌آزمایشی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه روش ها و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی و درسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. (نویسنده مسئول) mkeramaty@ut.ac.ir

2 دانشجوی دکتری گروه مدیریت آموزشی، واحد قم، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قم، ایران.

3 دانشجوی کارشناسی، مهندسی کامپیوتر و دوره کهاد علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

مقدمه و هدف: هدف این مطالعه تعیین ادراک دانشجویان دوره کارشناسی ارشد رهبری آموزشی نسبت به تأثیر کار تیمی بر نگرش به کلاس درس و پیشرفت تحصیلی آنان در محیط ترکیبی ادوبی کانکت و واتساپ (متاکوو) بود.
 روش‌شناسی پژوهش: این مطالعه در مرحله کمی بصورت طرح یک‌مرحله‌ای از نوع پیش آزمایشی انجام شد. هفده دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد به‌عنوان گروه آزمایش پرسش‌نامه‌ «در این کلاس چه می‌گذرد؟» را تکمیل نمودند. پیشرفت تحصیلی آنان توسط آزمونهای مستمر و پایانی اندازه‌گیری شد.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد کار تیمی روی نگرش دانشجویان به کلاس درس و پیشرفت تحصیلی آنان تأثیر مثبت دارد. برای پیگیری این داده‌ها و شناسایی چگونگی تأثیر کار تیمی، 15 نفر از 17 دانشجوی گروه آزمایش به‌صورت داوطلبانه در مصاحبه‌های نیمه ساختاریافته شرکت کردند. با استفاده از نرم‌افزار تحلیل کیفی Atlas/ti ، دو مقوله اصلی شامل محیط کلاس و کیفیت یادگیری شناسایی شد.
بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج این مطالعه می‌تواند انگیزه معلمان را برای اجرای کار تیمی در محیطهای ترکیبی آنلاین افزایش دهد و مدیران را ترغیب کند تا بستر مناسبی را برای اجرا فراهم سازند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Perception of Postgraduate Students in the Field of Educational Leadership of Teamwork in the Hybrid Environment of Adobe Connect and WhatsApp: Qualitative Follow up a Pre-experimental Study

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Reza Keramati 1
  • Fahimeh Ansarizadeh 2
  • Ali keramati 3
1 Faculty of psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. (Corresponding author).
2 . Ph.D. student in Educational leadership, Faculty of humanities, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran.
3 B.S Student, Department of Computer, School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, and Minor Field in Education, Department of Education, Faculty of Psychology & Education, University of Tehran.
چکیده [English]

Background and Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine students' perception of the effect of teamwork in the hybrid environment of Adobe Connect and WhatsApp.
research methodology: This study was carried out in a quantitative phase as a one-stage pre-experimental design. Seventeen master students as the experimental group of the questionnaire "What is happening in this class?" completed. Their academic achievement was measured by the summative evaluation.
Findings: The results showed that teamwork has a positive effect on the classroom attitude and students' academic achievement. To follow up quantitative data and also to identify how teamwork is effective, 17 students voluntarily participated in semi-structured interviews. Using Atlas/ti qualitative analysis software, two main categories including classroom environment and learning quality were identified.
Conclusion: The results of this study can increase teachers' motivation to implement teamwork in online hybrid environments and encourage administrators to provide a suitable platform for implementation.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • attitude
  • teamwork
  • e-learning
  • educational leadership
  • deep learning

مراجع

Abdel-Mordy, M. A., Sabry, S. S., & Abdelrazek, A. (2022). Effect of Cooperative Jigsaw Learning Strategy on Community Nursing Students’ Attitude and Achievement. International Egyptian Journal of Nursing Sciences and Research, 2(2), 487–500. [DOI:10.21608/ejnsr.2022.212558]
Alexander, S., & McKenzie, J. (1998). An evaluation of information technology projects for university learning. Canberra, ACT: Committee for University Teaching and Staff Development and the Department of Employment. Education, Training, and Youth Affairs.
Akhmedov, B. (2022). A New Approach to Teaching Information Technologies in Education. Central Asian Journal of Education and Computer Sciences (CAJECS), 1(2), 73- 78. [DOI:/www.cajecs.com/index.php/cajecs/article/view/28]
Amedu, O. I., & Gudi, K. C. (2017). Attitude of Students towards Cooperative Learning in Some Selected Secondary Schools in Nasarawa State. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(10), 29-34. [DOI:10.17762/turcomat.v12i3.663]
Arshad Khan, M. Vivek. Kamalun Nabi, M. Khojah, M & Tahir, M. (2021). Students’ Perception towards E-Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic in India: An Empirical Study. Sustainability, 13(1), 1-14. [DOI:10.3390/su13010057]
Carlos Torrego‐Seijo, J., Caballero‐García, P. N., & Lorenzo‐Llamas, E. M. (2020). The effects of cooperative learning on trait emotional intelligence and academic achievement of Spanish primary school students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 928–949. [DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12400]
Chan, M. (2020). A multilevel SEM study of classroom talk on cooperative learning and academicachievement: Does cooperative scaffolding matter? International Journal of Educational Research, 101, 101564. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101564]
Chatterjee, R. Corria, A. (2020). Online Students’ Attitudes toward Collaborative Learning and Sense of Community. American Journal of Distance Education, 53-68. [DOI:10.1080/08923647.2020.1703479]
Chebii, R., Wachanga, S. W., & Anditi, Z. O. (2018). Effects of Cooperative e-learning approach on Students’ Chemistry Achievement in Koibatek Sub-County, Kenya. Creative Education, 09(12), 1872–1880. [DOI:10.4236/ce.2018.912137]
Choudhury, S., & Pattnaik, S. (2020). Emerging themes in e-learning: A review from the stakeholders' perspective. Computers & Education, 144(6), 103-657. [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103657]
Dendup, T., & Onthanee, A. (2020). Effectiveness of cooperative learning on English communicative ability of 4th grade students in Bhutan, International Journal of Instruction 13(1), 255-266.  [DOI:10.29333/iji.2020.13117a]
Eardrod, W., Panprueksa, K., & Chauvatcharrin, N. (2021). The study of learning achievement and attitude toward science for 9th grade students with learning package using the cooperative learning STAD technique on ecosystem. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 23(1), 252-263.
Frania, M., & Correia, F. L. D. S. (2022). Interpersonal Competences and Attitude to Online Collaborative Learning (OCL) among Future Pedagogues and Educators—A Polish and Portuguese Perspective. Education Sciences, 12(1), 23. [DOI:10.3390/educsci12010023]
Gachago, D., Morris, A., & Simon, E. (2011). Engagement levels in a graphic design clicker class: Students’ perceptions around attention, participation and peer learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 10(1), 253-269.‏ [DOI:https://www.learntechlib.org/p/111521/]
Garcia, C., & Privado, J. (2023). Predicting cooperative work satisfaction of autonomous groups using a wiki tool in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 117-128.‏ [DOI:10.1080/10494820.2020.1764590]
Gull, F., & Shehzad, S. (2015). Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students’ Academic Achievement. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 9(3), 246–255. [DOI:10.11591/edulearn.v9i3.2071]
Irsyadiah, N., & Rifa’i, A. (2021). Inovasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Berbasis Blended Cooperative E-Learning Di Masa Pandemi. Syntax Idea, 3(2), 347. [DOI:10.36418/syntax-idea.v3i2.1011]
Keramati, M. R. (2009). The effect of cooperative learning on the academic achievement of physics in the field of energy. Journal of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, 39(2). [In persian]
Keramati, M. R., & Gillies, R. (2021). Constraints of Cooperative Learning in University Classrooms: A Qualitative Study in Iran and Australia. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education, 958-972. [DOI:10.22034/ijce.2020.254377.1234]
Keramati, M. R., & Gillies, R. (2022a). Perceptions of nursing
students on the effect of cooperative learning on academic achievement and learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments. [DOI:10.1080/10494820.2022.2043388]
Keramati, M. R., & Gillies, R. (2022b). Teaching cooperative
learning through cooperative learning environment: a qualitative follow-up of an experimental study, Interactive Learning Environments. [DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2022.2100429]
Lilyana, R. (2019). Frame based e-learning model at the workplace. Technics and Technologies. Vol. XVII. 2534-9384 (Online).
Malan, M. (2021). The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning in an Online Learning Environment through a Comparison of Group and Individual Marks. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 19(6), pp588-600. [DOI: 10.34190/ejel.19.6.2238]
Maněnová, M. (2015). Evaluation of e-learning courses using communicative and cooperative tools. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 884-890.‏ [DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.554]
Muchayat, M. (2021). Improving Learning Achievement in Normal Distribution through Cooperative Learning Model of Jigsaw Type. Ideguru: Journal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 6(1). [DOI:10.51169/ideguru.v6i1.177]
Mujib, A., & Marhamah, M. (2020). Al-Quran Learning Innovation Based on Blended Cooperative e-Learning in School. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 10(4), 47-54.‏  [DOI:10.36941/jesr-2020-0063]
Namira Nur Rachmadewi, S., Luthfiyah Nurulita, H., Nur Filhak, R., Az Zahra, S., Pemanasari, A., & Eliyawati. (2021). Cooperative Learning Model in Science Online Learning for 9th Grade Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2098(1), 012006. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/2098/1/012006]
Pourkrimi, J., Alimardani, Z. (2019). Factors affecting interactions in electronic learning environments (a meta-composite study). Quarterly Journal of Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 1 (1), 55-65. [In persian]
Rabgay, T. (2018). The Effect of Using Cooperative Learning Method on Tenth Grade Students’ Learning Achievement and Attitude towards Biology. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 265–280. [DOI:10.12973/iji.2018.11218a]
Rahayu, W., & Putra M.D.K. (2021). Rahmawati, Y., Hayat, B., Koul, R.B. Validating an Indonesian Version of the What Is Happening in this Class? (WIHIC) Questionnaire Using a Multidimensional Rasch Model. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 919-934. [DOI:10.29333/iji.2021.14252a]
Robinson, H. A. Kilgore, W. & Warren, S. J. (2017). Care, communication, learner support: Designing meaningful online collaborative learning. Online Learning, 21(4), 29-51. [DOI:10.24059/olj.v21i4.1240]
Samosa, R. C. (2021). Cooperative Learning Approach as Innovation to Improve Students’ Academic Achievement and Attitude in Teaching Biology. Journal of World Englishness and Educational Practices, 3(1), 01–10. [DOI:10.32996/jweep.2021.3.1.1]
Sánchez, J., Salinas, L., & Harris, J. (2011). Education with ICT in South Korea and Chile. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(2), 126–148. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.03.003]
Segundo Marcos, R. I., López Fernández, V., Daza González, M. T., & Phillips-Silver, J. (2020). Promoting children’s creative thinking through reading and writing in a cooperative learning classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100663. [DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100663]
Şeşen, B. A., Kırbaşlar, F. G., & Avcı, F. (2019). Instructional curriculum based on cooperative learning related to the structure of matter and its properties: Learning achievement, motivation and attitude. South African Journal of Education, 39(3), 1-14. [DOI:https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-1878f3a57d]
Silalahi, T. F., & Hutauruk, A. F. (2020). The Application of Cooperative Learning Model during Online Learning in the Pandemic Period. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(3), 1683–1691. [DOI:10.33258/birci.v3i3.1100]
Skordi, P., & Fraser, B. J. (2019). Validity and use of the What Is Happening In this Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire in university business statistics classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 22(2), 275-295. [DOI:10.1007/s10984-018-09277-4]
Troussas, C., Giannakas, F., Sgouropoulou, C., and Voyiatzis, I. (2023).  Collaborative activities recommendation based on students’ collaborative learning styles. Interactive Learning Environments, 31:1, 54-67. [DOI:10.1080/10494820.2020.1761835]
Umar, N., Atan, N. A., & Majid, U. M. A. (2023). Learning Activities Based on Social Constructivism Theory to Promote Social Interaction and Student Performance (Epsism).  In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2569, No. 1, p. 060004). AIP Publishing LLC. ‏ [DOI:10.1063/5.0112879]
Wyk, M. M. V. (2012). The Effects of the STAD-Cooperative Learning Method on Student Achievement, Attitude and Motivation in Economics Education. Journal of Social Sciences, 33(2), 261–270. [DOI:10.1080/09718923.2012.11893104]
Xue, G., & Lingling, L. (2018). A comparative study on cooperative learning in multimedia and network environment used by English majors between China Mainland and Taiwan. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(1), 127-135. [DOI:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.1p.127]
Yeh, S. P., & Fu, H. W. (2014). Effects of cooperative e-learning on learning outcomes. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(6), 531-536.‏ [DOI:10.12973/eurasia.2014.1212a]

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 13 تیر 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 13 مهر 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 17 مهر 1402

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار