تبیین ابعاد، مؤلفه‌ها و نشانگرهای محیط یادگیری جذاب

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه آموزش روانشناسی و مشاوره، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران

3 دانش آموخته دکتری مدیریت، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه و هدف:

امروزه مدارس پیشرو به‌خوبی دریافته‌اند که یادگیری فعال، خلاقانه و فراگیرمحور، در گرو ایجاد محیط یادگیری جذاب و دلپذیر است. با این رویکرد، هدف از پژوهش حاضر، تبیین ابعاد، مؤلفه‌ها و نشانگرهای محیط‌های یادگیری جذاب بود.

روش‌شناسی پژوهش:

این پژوهش از لحاظ هدف، کاربردی است و از لحاظ مبانی هستی شناسی، مبتنی بر پارادایم تفسیری است. روش پژوهش، کیفی و راهبرد مورد استفاده، مرور نظام‌مند مبتنی بر الگوی سندلوسکی و باروسو (2007) بود. برای استخراج نشانگرهای محیط یادگیری جذاب، تعداد 13 پژوهش که گزارش آن‌ها در مجلات داخلی یا خارجی منتشر شده بود، به روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب و مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت. ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات، مقالات منتخب بود. تحلیل اطلاعات از طریق کدگذاری نظری و مقوله‌بندی صورت گرفت. اعتبار تحلیل‌ها با استناد به ضریب لاوشه تأیید شد.

یافته‌ها:

یافته‌ها بیانگر دستیابی به الگوی محیط یادگیری جذاب مشتمل بر 70 نشانگر، 18 مؤلفه و 7 بعد بود. ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های شناسایی شده عبارت از مدرسه زندگی؛ مدرسه دوستدار کودک؛ جاذبه‌های علمی، ادبی، فرهنگی، هنری؛ زیرساخت‌ها؛ امنیت و آرامش؛ آموزش فراگیر؛ و ارتباطات آموزشی هستند.

بحث و نتیجه‌گیری:

این یافته‌ها چشم‌اندازی عملی برای طراحی محیط‌های یادگیری جذاب و الهام‌بخش ارائه می‌دهد که می‌توانند توسعه فردی و تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان را تسهیل کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Explaining the Dimensions, Components, and Indicators of an attractive Learning Environment

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyed Adnan Hossieni 1
  • Khalil Zandi 2
  • Behnam Heidari 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology and Counselling, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Administration, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
3 Ph.D in Management, Farhangian University, Sanandaj, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Background and Objective: Today, leading schools have recognized that active, creative, and learner-centered education depends on creating an attractive and pleasant learning environment. Thus, the present study aimed to explain the dimensions, components, and indicators of attractive learning environments.
research methodology: This research is applied in purpose. Using a qualitative methodology within the interpretive paradigm, a systematic review based on Sandelowski and Barroso’s (2007) framework was conducted. Thirteen studies published in national and international journals were purposefully selected and analyzed through theoretical coding and categorization.
Findings: The findings revealed a comprehensive model of engaging learning environments comprising 70 indicators, 18 components, and 7 dimensions. The identified dimensions (and components) include: School as Life (Promoting social responsibility; authentic and situational learning, and authentic assessment); Child-Friendly School (Active and learner-centered teaching; gamification of educational activities, and environmental suitability); Scientific, Literary, Cultural, and Artistic Attractions (Artistic and literary festivals, and local, national, and religious symbols); Infrastructure (The suitability of educational and quasi-educational spaces, and technological infrastructure); Safety and Calmness )Physical security and attractiveness; mental health, and environmental hygiene); Inclusive Education (Personalized learning, and equity); Educational Communication (Transparency; home-school interaction, and friendly relationships(.
Conclusion: These findings provide practical insights for designing inspiring learning environments that promote both academic and personal development.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Learning environment
  • school as life
  • child-friendly school

مراجع

Abusafieh, S., Muwahid, N., Muwahid, R., & Alhawatmah, L. (2022). The Effectiveness of Kindergarten Buildings in Jordan: Shaping the Future toward Child-Friendly Architecture. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics, 17, 161-174. [https://doi.org/10.55549/epstem.1176080]
Al-Mahasneh, R. (2018). The Role of Teachers in Establishing an Attractive Environment to Develop the Creative Thinking among Basic Stage Students in the Schools of Tafilah Governorate According to their own Perspective. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 7 (1), 206-221. [https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v7n1p206]
Arik, S., & Yilmaz, M. (2020). The Effect of Constructivist Learning Approach and Active Learning on Environmental Education: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 10 (2), 44-84. [https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1239355]
Bagheri Kerachi, A., Sadeghi, S., & Iemani, M.A. (2023). Designing a Conceptual Framework for a Child-Friendly School in Iran. Thinking and Children, Biannual Journal, 14(1), 29-61. [10.30465/FABAK.2023.7943] (Persian).
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23-28), 2.‏ [B2n.ir/u44817]
Bandura, A. (2023). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective on human nature. John Wiley & Sons.‏ [https://www.wiley.com/enus/Social+Cognitive+Theory%3A+An+Agentic+Perspective+on+Human+Nature-p-9781394161461]
Bishop, C. F., Caston, M. I., & King, C. A. (2014). Learner-centered environments: Creating effective strategies based on student attitudes and faculty reflection. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14 (3), 46-63. [https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v14i3.5065]
Carlos, V., Reses, G., & Soares, S. C. (2024). Active learning spaces design and assessment: a qualitative systematic literature review. Interactive Learning Environments, 32 (6), 2925-2942. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2163263]
Chen, P., Liu, X., Cheng, W., & Huang, R. (2017). A review of using Augmented Reality in Education from 2011 to 2016. Innovations in smart learning, 13-18.‏ [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2419-1_2]
Cobanoglu, F., & Sevim, S. (2019). Child-Friendly Schools: An Assessment of Kindergartens. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5 (4), 637-650. [https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.4.637]
Cross, D., Waters, S., Pearce, N., Shaw, T., Hall, M., Erceg, E., et al. (2012). The Friendly Schools Friendly Families program: Three-year bullying behavior outcomes in primary school children. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 394–406. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.05.004]
Cutillas, M. A., Lagumbay, D. G., Ancajas, V. M., Besinga, A. O., Alo, B. A., Ibale, E. D., & Neri, R. (2023). Enhancing student learning through classroom design: exploring the influence of environment on academic performance. World Journal on Education and Humanities Research, 3 (4), 27-37. [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373640279]
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11 (4), 227-268. [https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01]
Doğanay, A., & Sari, M. (2012). A Study of Developing the Thinking-Friendly Classroom Scale (TFCS). Elementary Education Online, 11(1), 214-229. https://ilkogretim-online.org/index.php/pub/article/view/3711
Edgerton, E., & McKechnie, J. (2023). The relationship between student’s perceptions of their school environment and academic achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 13: 959259. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.959259]
Erdianti, R., & Al-Fatih, S. (2020). Children Friendly School as the Legal Protection for Children
in Indonesia. Varia Justicia, 16(2), 137-155. [https://doi.org/10.31603/variajusticia.v16i2.3725]
Fitriani, S., Istaryatiningtias, I., & Qodariah, L. (2021). A child-friendly school: how the school implements the model. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10 (1), 273–284. [http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20765]
Fogarty, W., Riddle, S., Lovell, M. & Wilson, B (2017). Indigenous education and literacy policy in Australia: Bringing learning back to the debate. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 47(2), 1–13. [https://doi.org/10.1017/jie.2017.18]
Ghanbari, S., Zandi, K., & Sādeghi, S. (2022). Exploring and prioritizing authentic instruction strategies. Journal of Educational Innovations, 21(2), 7-28. [10.22034/jei.2021.285182.1914]. (Persian).
Gonzalez, A. (2020). The Factors of Latinx Parent Participation in Rural School Districts (Doctoral dissertation, California State University, Bakersfield). [B2n.ir/t36851]
Green, S. A., & Gredler, M. E. (2002). A Review and Analysis of Constructivism for School-Based Practice. School Psychology Review, 31 (1), 53-70. [https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2002.12086142]
Hajaroh, M., Rukiyati., Purwastuti, L. A., & Nurhayati, R. (2021). Development of the
Evaluation Instrument of the Child-Friendly School Policy in Elementary Schools. International
Journal of Instruction, 14 (3), 327-340. [https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1304571]
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure?. Child Development, 76 (5), 949-967. [10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00889.x]
Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2014). Authentic learning environments (pp. 401-412). Springer New York.‏ [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_32]
Ismail, S. R., Radzi, R., Megat Kamaruddin, P. S. N., Lokman, E. F., Lim, H. Y., Abdul Rahim, N., ... & Lai, N. M. (2024). The effects of school-based hygiene intervention programme: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos one, 19(10), e0308390.‏ [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308390]
Karimi, N., Khosronia, M., & Dezhpasand, S. (2021). Developing a model for spatial indicators of experimental learning and its application in designing learning environments. Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism(JIAU), 12(1), 111-125. [https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2021.219630.1359]. (Persian).
Levin, M. B., Bowie, J. V., Ragsdale, S. K., Gawad, A. L., Cooper, L. A., & Sharfstein, J. M. (2021). Enhancing community engagement by schools and programs of public health in the United States. Annual Review of Public Health, 42(1), 405-421.‏ [https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102324]
Lindner, K. T., & Schwab, S. (2020). Differentiation and individualisation in inclusive education: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. International journal of inclusive education, 1-21. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1813450]
Malekian, F. (2018). Description and Analysis of Criteria for Designing Educational Spaces Based from the Viewpoint of Educational Technology Professionals on Creative Thinking. Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 12(Special Issue), 731-748. [https://www.jiera.ir/article_65023.html?lang=en]. (Persian).
Mandiudza, L. (2013). Child Friendly Schools. Greener Journal of Educational Research, 3 (6), 283-288. [https://www.gjournals.org/GJER/archive/aug-2013-vol-36/mandiudza.html]
Mansori, S., Zweig, J., Huntington, A., & McMahon, T. (2024). Learning through Play: Foundational Research on Teacher Professional Development. Education Development Center, Inc.‏ [https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED642526]
Mirmoradi, S.S. (2018). Nature-based design strategies of primary educational spaces to access the goals of national curriculum of Iran. Research in Curriculum Planning, 15 (56), 109-131. [https://doi.org/10.30486/jsre.2018.539728]. (Persian).
Obied, T. (2020). Role of School Administration in Providing an Attractive and Safe School Environment to Students under Vision 2030. Propósitos y Representaciones, 8 (3), 748-762. [https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2020.v8nSPE3.748]
Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38 (2), 109-119. [https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332374]
Rezaei, H., & Yamani, N. (2016). The Role of Learning Environment in Education Improvement and Interducing its Measurement Tools. Educational Development of Judishapur, 7(1), 37-47. [https://edj.ajums.ac.ir/article_79773.html?lang=en]. (Persian).
Rusticus, S. A., Pashootan, T., & Mah, A. (2023). What are the key elements of a positive learning
environment? Perspectives from students and faculty. Learning Environments Research, (26), 161-175. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09410-4]
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior.‏ In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.) , Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 654–678). The Guilford Press. [https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-11667-026]
Sadi, O., & Lee, M. (2024). Relationships between constructivist learning environment perceptions, conceptions of learning biology and achievement goal orientations. Journal of Biological Education, 58 (1), 101-118. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.2020877]
Safaie, M., Mohamad Rezaie, A., khosravi, M., mahdavi gharavi, M., & bahramiyan, T. (2012). The Standardization ofLearningEnvironment Perceptions Survey (PES-HS). Journal of Educational Psychology Studies, 9(16), 112-130. [https://doi.org/10.22111/jeps.2012.1041]. (Persian).
Sau, N.T., Phuong, C.N., & Hoi, H.T. (2020). Benefits of Building Child-centered Learning
Environment in Kindergarten. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12), 6765-6769. [https://www.hrpub.org/journals/article_info.php?aid=10177]
Saunders, J. N. (2021). The power of the arts in learning and the curriculum: a review of research literature. Curriculum Perspectives, 41(1), 93-100.‏ [https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-021-00138-4]
Simões, J., Redondo, R.D., & Vilas, A.F. (2013). A social gamification framework for a K-6 learning platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 345-353. [https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2515.1201]
Smith, A. B. (2008). Children’s rights and early childhood education: Links to theory and advocacy. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 33 (4), 1-8.  [ https://doi.org/10.1177/183693910703200302]
Taylor, A. F., & Butts-Wilmsmeyer, C. (2020). Self-regulation gains in kindergarten related to frequency of green schoolyard use. Journal of environmental psychology, 70, 101440.‏ [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101440]
Thomas, S., Alphonsa Jose, K., & Aneesh Kumar, P. (2018). Child friendly schools: Challenges and issues in creating a positive and protective school environment. Positive Schooling and Child Development: International Perspectives, 233-248.‏ [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0077-6_12]
Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., & Soenens, B. (2020). Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and emotion, 44 (1), 1-31.‏ [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09818-1]
Vella-Brodrick, D. A., & Gilowska, K. (2022). Effects of nature (greenspace) on cognitive functioning in school children and adolescents: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1217-1254.‏ [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09658-5]
Victoryana, J., Wirakusumah, I.A., & Sudradjat, I. (2024). Implementation of Children's Architectural Design Principles in Child-Friendly School Buildings (Case Study: Fuji Kindergarten, Japan & Farming Kindergarten, Vietnam). Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknolog, 5 (7), 3273-3289. [https://doi.org/10.59141/jist.v5i7.1205]
White, M. A., & Murray, A. S. (2015). Building a positive institution. Evidence-based approaches in positive education: Implementing a strategic framework for well-being in schools, 1-26.‏ [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9667-5_1]
Wiggins, G. (2011). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(7), 81-93.‏ [https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200721]
رهبری آموزشی کاربردی
دوره 6، شماره 1
فروردین 1404
صفحه 21-39

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 08 دی 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 19 بهمن 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 05 اسفند 1403

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار