طراحی مدل تعاملات بین‌سازمانی دانشگاه‌ها در راستای توسعه نوآوری فناورانه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی؛ دانشگاه شیراز؛ شیراز؛ ایران

2 کاندیدای دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، بخش مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

3 استاد بخش مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

4 دانشیار بخش مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، ایران

10.22098/ael.2025.17165.1561

چکیده

مقدمه و هدف: تعامل و همکاری اثربخش دانشگاه­ها با سایر بازیگران زیست­بوم نوآوری از مهم­ترین فاکتورهای رشد و توسعه فناوری­های کاربردی در جامعه می­باشد. بر این اساس، هدف از پژوهش حاضر طراحی مدلی جامع جهت تبیین تعاملات بین‌سازمانی دانشگاه‌ها در راستای توسعه نوآوری فناورانه بوده است.
روش‌شناسی پژوهش: این مطالعه با رویکرد کیفی و روش پژوهش فراترکیب نظریه‌ساز انجام گرفته است، بر این اساس، یافته‌های مطالعات علمی مرتبط در بازه زمانی 2025-1995 میلادی استخراج و داده­های گردآوری­شده طی سه مرحله کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی مورد تحلیل قرار گرفتند.
یافته‌ها: یافته­های پژوهش در قالب 53 کد باز و 12 کد محوری در سه محور پیشایندها، فرایندها و پیامدها ارائه گردید. محور پیشایندها در قالب 3 کد محوری (عوامل فردی، سازمانی، محیطی)؛ محور فرایندها در قالب 5 کد محوری (توسعه زیرساخت­های مشترک، انتقال دانش و فناوری، مدیریت پروژه­های مشترک، توسعه شبکه­های همکاری، مدیریت دانش)؛ محور پیامدها در قالب 4 کد محوری (توسعه محصولات و خدمات نوآورانه، افزایش درآمد سازمانی، توسعه اقتصادی و اجتماعی جامعه، ارتقاء اعتبار دانشگاه) سازماندهی گردیدند. جهت ارتقای اعتبار یافته­ها، چهار نوع راهبرد اعتباریابی توصیفی، تفسیری، نظری و پراگماتیک  مورد استفاده قرار گرفت.
بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: اثربخشی تعاملات بین­سازمانی دانشگاه­ها در توسعه نوآوری فناورانه، حاصل توجه به عوامل پیش­نیاز و فرایندهای کارآمد در جریان شکل­گیری این تعاملات است. یافته­های این پژوهش می‌تواند به رهبران و سیاست‌گذاران آموزش عالی در طراحی راهبردهایی هوشمندانه برای توسعه همکاری‌های اثربخش بین‌سازمانی کمک کند، به­گونه­ای که تعاملات دانشگاه­ها با سایر سازمان­های جامعه را با رویکردی برد-برد و در راستای رفع نیازهای جامعه طراحی و اجرا نمایند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing a model of inter-organizational interactions of universities In order to development of technological innovation

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maasoumeh Mohtaram 1
  • Zahra Pakbaz 2
  • Jafar Torkzadeh 3
  • Ghasem Salimi 4
  • Mehdi Mohammadi 3
1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of educational Administration, University of Shiraz, Shiraz, Iran
2 Ph.D. Candidate in Educational Administration, Department of Educational Administration and Planning, School of Education and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
3 Professor, Department of Educational Administration and Planning, School of Education and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
4 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Administration and Planning, School of Education and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran0917
چکیده [English]

Background and Objective: Effective interaction and cooperation of universities with other players in the innovation ecosystem is one of the most important factors in the growth and development of applied technologies in society. Accordingly, the purpose of the present study was to design a comprehensive model to explain inter-organizational interactions between universities in order to develop technological innovation.
research methodology: This study was conducted with a qualitative approach and the theory-building metasynthesis research method. Accordingly, the findings of relevant scientific studies in the period 1995-2025 were extracted and the collected data were analyzed through three stages of open, axial, and selective coding.
Findings: The research findings were presented in the form of 53 open codes and 12 core codes in three axes of antecedents, processes, and outcomes. The antecedents axis was presented in the form of 3 core codes (individual, organizational, and environmental factors); the processes axis was presented in the form of 5 core codes (development of joint infrastructure, transfer of knowledge and technology, management of joint projects, development of cooperation networks, knowledge management); The outcomes were organized into four core codes (development of innovative products and services, increasing organizational income, economic and social development of the community, and enhancing the reputation of the university). To enhance the credibility of the findings, four types of validation strategies were used: descriptive, interpretive, theoretical, and pragmatic.
Conclusion: The effectiveness of inter-organizational interactions between universities in developing technological innovation is the result of paying attention to prerequisite factors and efficient processes during the formation of these interactions.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Interorganizational interactions
  • technological innovation
  • university
  • networking
  • knowledge management

مراجع

Agostini, L., Nosella, A., Sarala, R., Spender, J. C., & Wegner, D. (2020). Tracing the evolution of the literature on knowledge management in inter-organizational contexts: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(2), 463-490. [DOI:10.1108/JKM-07-2019-0382]

Al-Dmour, H. H., Alsfour, F., Al-Dmour, R. H., & Saifan, N. M. (2022). The role of marketing knowledge management in enhancing digital financial innovation in commercial banks: empirical study. International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), 18(1), 1-19. [DOI: 10.4018/IJKM.291094]

Ankrah, S., & Omar, A. T. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian journal of management, 31(3), 387-408. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003]

Asatiani, A., Hämäläinen, J., Penttinen, E., & Rossi, M. (2021). Constructing continuity across the organisational culture boundary in a highly virtual work environment. Information systems journal, 31(1), 62-93. [https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12293]

Awan, U. (2021). Steering for sustainable development goals: a typology of sustainable innovation. In Industry, innovation and infrastructure (pp. 1026-1036). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71059-4_64-1]

Banal-Estañol, A., Jofre-Bonet, M., & Lawson, C. (2015). The double-edged sword of industry collaboration: Evidence from engineering academics in the UK. Research Policy, 44(6), 1160-1175. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.02.006]

Bayuo, B. B., Chaminade, C., & Göransson, B. (2020). Unpacking the role of universities in the emergence, development and impact of social innovations–A systematic review of the literature. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 120030. [DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120030]

Catala, B., Savall, T., & Chaves-Avila, R. (2023). From entrepreneurial and innovation ecosystems to the social economy ecosystem. Journal of Business Research, 163, 113932. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113932]

Campbell-Kelly, M., Aspray, W. F., Yost, J. R., Tinn, H., & Díaz, G. C. (2023). Computer: A history of the information machine. Routledge.

Colovic, A., Caloffi, A., Rossi, F., & Russo, M. (2025). Institutionalising the digital transition: The role of digital innovation intermediaries. Research Policy, 54(1), 105146. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105146]

Coveri, A., & Zanfei, A. (2023). Who wins the race for knowledge-based competitiveness? Comparing European and North American FDI patterns. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(1), 292-330. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09911-z]

Dalkir, K., Iancu, M., & Oliveira, D. (2019, May). The effects of inter-organizational communication on collaborative intellectual capital. In European Conference on Intangibles and Intellectual Capital (pp. 89-XI). Academic Conferences International Limited.

Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of management review, 23(4), 660-679. [https://doi.org/10.2307/259056]

Ebner, A. (2024). Innovation in economic evolution: Reintroducing Schumpeterian thought to current advances in economic sociology. Current Sociology, [https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921241271850].

Ebrahiminejad, M. and Dehghani Soltani, M. (2018). The Role of Technological Innovation Capabilities on Innovative Performance Promotion in Knowledge-Based Firms (Studying Firms in Science and Technology Park of Tehran University). Public Management Researches, 11(41), 83-109. [In Persian]. [doi: 10.22111/jmr.2018.4452

Esendemir, N., & Zehir, C. (2017). Innovation and Performance: The Mediating Effect of Organizational Learning and Technological Capability: Innovation and Performance. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 6(4), 48-60. [DOI:10.20525/ijrbs.v6i4.747]

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29(2), 109-123. [DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4]

Fortes, M. V. B., Agostini, L., Wegner, D., & Nosella, A. (2023). Paradoxes and tensions in interorganizational relationships: A systematic literature review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(1), 35. [DOI:10.3390/jrfm16010035]

Geuna, A., & Muscio, A. (2009). The governance of university knowledge transfer: A critical review of the literature. Minerva, 47, 93-114. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9118-2]

Ghardashi, F., Yaghoubi, M., Teymourzadeh, E., Bahadori, M., & Salesi, M. (2023). The innovation capability model in higher education: A structural equation modelling approach. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 15(4), 473-481. [DOI:10.1080/20421338.2022.2125594]

Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 109-122. [DOI:10.1002/smj.4250171110]

Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2017). The impact of Triple Helix agents on entrepreneurial innovations' performance: An inside look at enterprises located in an emerging economy. Technological forecasting and social change, 119, 294-309. [DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.015]

Gulati, R. (2020). Network ties and organization strategy: Linking network structure and strategic behavior. Oxford University Press.

Haghighi Talab, A., Scholten, V., & van Beers, C. (2020). The role of universities in inter-organizational knowledge collaborations. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11(2), 458-478. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-018-0545-x]

Hite, K. A., & Seitz, J. L. (2021). Global issues: an introduction. John Wiley & Sons.

Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge.

Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of management review, 30(1), 146-165. [DOI:10.5465/AMR.2005.15281445]

Kakeu, C. B. P., Clovis, W. M., Kouhomou, C. Z., & Kamdoum, G. C. M. (2024). Can technological innovations contribute to more overcome the issue of poverty reduction in africa? Technology in Society, 102463. [DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102463]

khaledi, A., Asadifard, R. and Mirzaei Douraki, R. (2024). The Functions of Innovation Intermediaries in the Process of Inter-firm Technological Collaborations. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 17(2), 17-31. [doi: 10.22034/jstp.2024.11678.1791]

Khan, F. U., & Badulescu, D. (2025). Sustainability Pressures Unveiled: Navigating the Role of Organizational Sustainable Culture in Promoting Sustainability Performance. Sustainability, 17(3), 1322. [https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031322]

Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic management journal, 27(2), 131-150. [DOI:10.1002/smj.507]

Miremadi, S. I. (2019). Technological Innovation System: a Scheme of Innovation Policy and Technology Development. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 12(2), 171-192. [In Persian]. [https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20080840.1398.12.2.12.7]

Moscardini, A. O., Strachan, R., & Vlasova, T. (2022). The role of universities in modern society. Studies in Higher Education, 47(4), 812-830. [DOI:10.1080/03075079.2020.1807493]

Perkmann, M., Salandra, R., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., & Hughes, A. (2021). Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011-2019. Research policy, 50(1), 104114. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114]

Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative science quarterly, 116-145. [DOI:10.2307/2393988]

Radziwon, A., & Bogers, M. (2019). Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 573-587. [DOI:10.5465/AMBPP.2017.16692abstract]

Pestine-Stevens, A., & Greenfield, E. A. (2022). Giving, receiving, and doing together: Interorganizational interactions in age-friendly community initiatives. Journal of aging & social policy, 34(2), 218-236. [DOI:10.1080/08959420.2021.2024412]

Ribeiro, S. X., & Nagano, M. S. (2023). On the relation between knowledge management and university-industry-government collaboration in Brazilian national institutes of science and technology. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 53(4), 808-829 [https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-01-2020-0002]

Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2020). Interorganizational collaboration: Antecedents, processes, and outcomes. Oxford University Press.

Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic management journal, 25(3), 201-221. [DOI:10.1002/smj.376]

Saikouk, T., Fattam, N., Angappa, G., & Hamdi, A. (2021). The interplay between inter-personal and inter-organizational relationships in coordinating supply chain activities. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(3), 898-917. [DOI:10.1108/IJLM-11-2020-0443]

Schilling, M. A. (2017). Strategic management of technological innovation. McGraw-Hill.

Scuotto, V., Caputo, F., Villasalero, M., & Del Giudice, M. (2017). A multiple buyer–supplier relationship in the context of SMEs’ digital supply chain management. Production Planning & Control, 28(16), 1378-1388. [DOI:10.1080/09537287.2017.1375149]

Shafiee, M., Safaheih, H. (2021). Investigating the role of university-industry cooperation in the development of countries with a look at global policies and trade. Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9(2), 1-20. [In Persian]. [http://www.journalie.ir/en/Article/19762/FullText].

Song, Y. (2023). How do Chinese SMEs enhance technological innovation capability? From the perspective of innovation ecosystem. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(5), 1235-1254. [https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2022-0016]

Su, Z., Jiang, R., Feng, C., & Li, D. (2025). How does R&D collaboration shape the patent quality of universities?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-28. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-025-10204-y]

Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. R. (2020). Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley & Sons.

Tolstykh, T., Shmeleva, N., Gamidullaeva, L., & Krasnobaeva, V. (2023). The Role of Collaboration in the Development of Industrial Enterprises Integration. Sustainability, 15(9), 7180. [DOI:10.21685/2227-8486-2023-1-1]

Van de Vrande, V., De Jong, J. P., Vanhaverbeke, W., & De Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6-7), 423-437.

Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of management review, 27(2), 185-203. [DOI:10.2307/4134351]

Zamiri, M., & Esmaeili, A. (2024). Strategies, methods, and supports for developing skills within learning communities: A systematic review of the literature. Administrative Sciences, 14(9), 231. [https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14090231]

Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta‐synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of advanced nursing, 53(3), 311-318. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03721.x]

رهبری آموزشی کاربردی
دوره 6، شماره 2
تیر 1404
صفحه 22-44

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 22 فروردین 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 13 خرداد 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 14 خرداد 1404

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار