طراحی و اعتبارسنجی الگوی مربی‌گری الکترونیکی رهبران آموزشی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

2 گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

چکیده

هدف: هدف پژوهش حاضر طراحی و اعتبارسنجی الگوی مربی­گری الکترونیکی رهبران آموزشی است. این پژوهش از نوع کاربردی و از نظر روش اجرا، آمیخته می­باشد.
روش پژوهش: در بخش کیفی پژوهش، جامعه آماری صاحب­نظران حوزه آموزش بودند، که به روش هدفمند نظری انتخاب شدند و سپس با انجام مصاحبه نیمه ساختارمند با 20 نفر از مشارکت کنندگان اطلاعات و داده­ها جمع­آوری و با روش کدگذاری کلایزی تجزیه و تحلیل شدند. در بخش کمی، به منظور اعتبارسنجی الگوی طراحی شده، از پرسشنامه محقق­ ساخته مربی­گری الکترونیکی رهبران آموزشی استفاده شد. جامعه آماری این بخش مدیران مدارس شهر کرج در سال تحصیلی 1403-1402 بودند. حجم نمونه براساس معیارهای تعیین حجم نمونه تحلیل عاملی مونت کارلو 300 نفر، تعیین شد. تحلیل داده­ها با بهره­گیری از نرم­افزار Smart PLS، انجام گرفت.
یافته­ها: از بخش کیفی 15 بُعد («پذیرش»، «پرسیدن سوالات تأملی»، «شناسایی نیازها»، «تعیین سطح شایستگی»، «مسئولیت­پذیری»، «هدف­گذاری»، «برنامه­ریزی»، «تعیین محتوا»، «انتخاب فناوری»، «حفظ امنیت آنلاین»، «تأمین منابع انسانی ماهر»، «تأمین بودجه»، «تعامل»، «ارزیابی» و «بازخورد») برای مربی­گری الکترونیکی، شناسایی شد. یافته­های بخش کمی نیز نشان دادند که مدل طراحی شده از اعتبار مناسبی برخواردار است.
نتیجه­گیری: الگوی مربی­گری الکترونیکی رهبران آموزشی مبتنی بر 15 بُعد و 56 شاخص­ از اعتبار لازم برخوردار بوده و می­تواند به عنوان چارچوبی کارآمد برای بهبود اثربخشی مربی­گری الکترونیکی رهبران آموزشی مورد استفاده قرار گیرد تا موجب بالندگی آنان شود. براساس نتایج پژوهش، پیشنهاد می­شود مدارس، دانشگاه­ها و تمامی سازمان­های آموزشی از این الگو به عنوان راهنمای عملی برای طراحی و اجرای برنامه­های مربی­گری الکترونیکی بهره بگیرند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Design and Validation of an E-Coaching Framework for Educational Leaders

نویسندگان [English]

  • Parisa Gharibnavaz 1
  • Gholamreza Shams 2
  • Abasalt Khorasani 1
1 Department of Education, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University
2 Department of Education, Faculty of Education & Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University
چکیده [English]

Objective:: The purpose of the present study was to design and validate an e-coaching model for educational leaders. This research was applied in nature and employed a mixed-methods approach.
research methodology: In the qualitative phase, the study population consisted of experts in the field of education who were selected through theoretical purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 20 Participants and analyzed using Colaizzi's coding method. In the quantitative phase, a researcher-developed questionnaire on e-coaching for educational leaders was used to validate the proposed model. The statistical population in this phase included school principals in Karaj during the 2023–2024 academic year. Based on Monte Carlo simulations for sample size estimation in factor analysis, a sample of 300 individuals was selected. Data analysis was conducted using Smart PLS software.
Findings: The qualitative findings identified 15 dimensions of e-coaching, including: “Acceptance,” “Asking reflective questions,” “Needs assessment,” “Competency level identification,” “responsibility,” “Goal setting,” “Planning,” “Content determination,” “Technology selection,” “Online safety,” “Provision of skilled human resources,” “Budget allocation,” “Interaction,” “Evaluation,” and “Feedback.” The quantitative findings also showed that the developed model possessed acceptable validity.
Conclusion: The e-coaching model for educational leaders, consisting of 15 dimensions and 56 indicators, possesses sufficient validity and can serve as an effective framework for enhancing the effectiveness of e-coaching and promoting the professional development of educational leaders. Based on the findings, it is suggested that schools, universities and other educational organizations use this model as a practical guide for designing and implementing e-coaching programs.
.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Educational leaders
  • Mixed-methods approach
  • Coaching
  • E-coaching

مراجع

References
Adam, S., Annala, H., Bastian, A., Karlsson, M., Nevalainen, T., Tuominen, J., Vuorinen, V., Wójcik, K., Wołejsza, P., Mozyrska, D. and Pappas, N. (2023). Towards e-coaching - The first step to build trust with a digital coach. Leipzig University. Germany.
Albizu, E., Rekalde, I. Landeta, J. and Fernández-Ferrín, P. (2019). Analysis of executive coaching effectiveness: a study from the coachee perspective. Cuadernos de Gestión, 19(2), 33-52. [https://doi:10.5295/cdg.170876ea].
Al Khalaf, K., O’Dowling Keane, Sh., da Mata, C., McGillycuddy, C. T., Chadwick, B. L. and Lynch, Ch. D. (2022). Response rates to questionnaire-based studies in the contemporary dental literature: A systematic review. Journal of Dentistry, (126). 1-6. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104284].
Almuhsin, E., Soh, B., Li, A. and Ullah, A. (2023). Systematic Literature Review on the Effectiveness of E-Coaching in Higher Education. Creative Education, 14, 875-898. [https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.145057].
Alotebi, H., Alharbi, O. and Masmali, A. (2018). Effective Leadership in Virtual Learning Environments. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(2), 156-160. [https://doi:10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.2.1026].
Blackman, AC. (2007). The effectiveness of business coaching: an empirical analysis of the factors that contribute to successful outcomes. PhD thesis, James Cook University. [https://doi:10.25903/5atk-xv65].
Boysen, Sh. M. (2018). Coaching Effectiveness: Coach and Coachee Characteristics that Lead to Success. Philosophy of Coaching: An International Journal, 3(2), 6-26. [https://doi.org/10.22316/poc/03.2.02].
Burrous, T.C. (2021). A Comparison Study On E-Coaching and Face-To-Face Coaching. Pennsylvania, USA. Doctor of Education. University of Pennsylvania.
Champathes, MR. (2006). Coaching for performance improvement: The “Coach” model.
Development and Learning in Organizations, 20(2), 17-18. [https://doi.org/10.1108/14777280610645886].
Cheung, G. W., Cooper‑Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S. and Wang, L. C. (2023). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best‑practice recommendations. Asia Pacifc Journal of Management, 41(2), 745–783. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y].
Connor, C. M. (2017). Commentary on the Special Issue on Instructional Coaching Models: Common Elements of Effective Coaching Models. Theory into Practice, 56(1), 78–83. [https://doi:10.1080/00405841.2016.1274575].
Cushion, C. (2007). Modelling the Complexity of the Coaching Process. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 2(4), 395-401. [https://doi:10.1260/174795407783359650].
Daruhadi, G. (2024). Phenomenological Method as A Theoretical Basis of Qualitative Methods. International Journal of Social Health, 3(9), 599-613. [https://doi:10.58860/ijsh.v3i9.238].
Devine, M., Meyers, R. & Houssemand, C. (2013). How can coaching make a positive impact within educational settings? .Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93(3), 1382-1389. [https://doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.048].
Diller, S.J., & Passmore, J. (2023). Defining digital coaching: a qualitative inductive approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 1-9. [https://doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1148243].   
Eliadis, A. (2023). Coaching History: The Evolution of a Profession. Journal of Organizational Culture Communications and Conflict, 27(1), 1-18.
Ensminger, D., Kallemeyn, L. M., Rempert, T., Wade, J. & Polanin, M. (2015). Case study of an evaluation coaching model: Exploring the role of the evaluator. Evaluation and Program Planning, 49(21), 124-136. [https://doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.01.002].
Ermeling, B. A., Tatsui, T. T. & Young, K. R. (2015). Virtual Coaching for Instructional Leaders: A Multi-Method Investigation of Technology-Enabled External Assistance. Teachers College Record, 117(11), 1-48. [https://doi:10.1177/016146811511701108].
Fayyazi, M., & Ayoubzadeh, M. (2016). Investigating the effect of face-to-face communication on the relationship between e-coaching and students' career decision-making. Journal of Human Resources Education and Development, 2(6), 143-165 (In Persian).
Gessnitzer, S., & Kauffeld, S. (2015). The working alliance in coaching: Why behavior is the key to success. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 51(2), 177–197. [https://doi:10.1177/0021886315576407].
Grant, M., & Spence, B. (2009). Using coaching and positive psychology to promote a
flourishing workforce: A model of goal-striving and mental health. 173-188. [https://doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195335446.013.0014].
Hassanpoor, A., Vakili, Y., Jaafari nia, S. and Farhadi, R. (2021). Barriers and challenges of managers coaching success in the petrochemical industry. Development of Quarterly Journal of Training & Human Resources, 30(8), 161-188. [https://doi:10.52547/istd.31333.8.30.161](In Persian).
Israel, M., Carnahan, C. R., Snyder, K. K. & Williamson, P. (2012). Supporting New Teachers of Students with Significant Disabilities Through Virtual Coaching: A Proposed Model. Remedial and Special Education, 34(4), 195–204. [https://doi:10.1177/0741932512450517].
Kamphorst, B. A., & Anderson, J. H. (2025). E‑coaching systems and social justice: ethical concerns about inequality, coercion, and stigmatization. AI and Ethics, 5(2), 911–920. [https://doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00424-7].
Kanatouri, S. 2020. Digital coaching: A conceptually distinct form of coaching? Open-Access-Publikation im Sinne der CC-Lizenz BY-NC-ND 4.0. 40-50. [https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666407420.40].
Kashani, P., Shaemi Barzoki, A. and Teimouri, H. (2023). Designing and Evaluation of Coaching Model in the Workplace (Case study: Isfahan Mobarakeh Steel Company). Journal: Public Management Researches 60(16), 135- 162. [https://doi:10.22111/JMR.2022.40802.5675] (In Persian).
Keller-Boudreaux, M. K. (2021). A Case Study Investigating e-Coaching of Aspiring Urban School Leaders. Arizona, USA. Doctor of Education. University of Arizona State.
Klar, H.W., Huggins, K. Sh., Andreoli, P. M. & Buskey, F. C. (2020). Developing Rural School Leaders Through Leadership Coaching: A Transformative Approach, Leadership and Policy in Schools, (19)4, 539-559. [https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2019.1585553].
Kovanen, A., & Dunn, K. (2010). Coaching Methods for SME's. Bachelors Thesis. Degree Programme in International Business School of Business Administration.
Linden, S. v. d., Meij, J. V. D., & Kenney, S. M. (2019). Design and Enactment of Mobile Video Coaching. TechTrends, 63(2), 693–702. [https://doi:10.1007/s11528-019-00413-2].
Mayunia, I., Leiliyanti. E., Mustikaning Palupi, T., Lusiana Sitorus, M., Chen, M. (2022). Designing Literacy E-Coaching Model for English Language Teachers of Junior High Schools in Indonesia. TEFLIN Journal, (33)2, 310-329. [https://doi:10.15639/teflinjournal.v33i2/310-329].
Moos, Ch., & Spranz-Fogasy, Th. (2024). "Now once again this idea of yours (…) how does it sound when I say that?" - Changing the perspective: how coach's questioning practices elicit self-reflecting processes in clients. Front Psychol, 15, 1-13. [https://doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1241489].
Narenji Thani, F., Keramati, M. R., Mirshahvalad, E., Taghavi Monfared, A., Lohrasbi, M. (2024). Exploring and Classifying Critical Challenges of E-learning Through a Systematic Approach at the University of Tehran. Iranian Distance Education Journal, (6)1, 58-81. [https://doi:10.30473/idej.2024.70067.1185].
Neacsu, M. G., Dumitru, G., & Adascalitei, A. (2012). An Experimental E-Coaching Model Used for Training Student Teachers. The 8th International Scientific Conference eLearning and software for Education Bucharest, 263-269. [https://doi:10.5682/2066-026X-12-042].
Qian, X., Clary, E., Johnson, D. R., & Echternacht, J. K. (2018). The Use of a Coaching Model to Support the Academic Success and Social Inclusion of Students with Intellectual Disabilities in Community and Technical College Settings. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, (31)3, 193-208.
Rafati, M., Mousakhani, M. Zabihi, M.R. and Ghorbani, M. (2021). Designing an Organizational Coaching Model for Public Organizations: An Organizational Soft Productivity Approach. Productivity Management 1(15), 77-106. [https://doi:10.30495/qjopm.2020.1875757.2581] (In Persian).
Rajabpour, E. (2020). Explaining the Factors Affecting the Acceptance of E-Coaching Using Structural-Interpretive Modeling (Case Study: Social Security Organization). Journal of Iranian Public Administration Studies, 3(1), 155-178. [https://doi:10.22034/jipas.2020.244277.1096] (In Persian).
Regan, K., Weiss, M. P., & Evmenova, A. S. (2017). Using E-coaching to Improve Practice of Novice Teacher Educators. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 6(1), 45-64. [https://doi:10.14434/jotlt.v6.n1.21321].
Regmi, P. R., Waithaka, E., Paudyal, A., Simkhada, P., & Teijlingen, E., V. (2016). Guide to the design and application of online questionnaire surveys. Nepal J Epidemiol, 6(4), 640–644. [https://doi:10.3126/nje.v6i4.17258].
Ribbers, A., & Waringa, A. (2015). E-Coaching: Theory and practice for a new online approach to coaching. New York: Routledge. [https://doi:10.4324/9781315771670].
Rosa, W. E., Karanja, V., Kpoeh, J.D.N., McMahon, C., & Booth, J. (2021). A Virtual Coaching Workshop for a Nurse-Led Community-Based Palliative Care Team in Liberia, West Africa, to Promote Staff Well-Being During COVID-19. Nurs Educ Perspect, 42(6), 194-196. [https://doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000828].
Sonesh, Sh. C., Coultas, Ch. W., Marlow, Sh. L., Lacerenza, Ch. N., Reyes, D., & Salas, E. (2015). Coaching in the wild: identifying factors that lead to success. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 67(3), 189–217. [https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000042]
Stein, D. S., & Wanstreet, C. E. (2013). e-Coaching Success Strategies for Synchronous Discussions. Distance Learning, (10)2, 19-24. [https://doi.org/10.1108/DL-06-2013-0004]
Stratton, S. J. 2024. Purposeful Sampling: Advantages and Pitfalls. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 39(2), 121–122. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X24000281]  
Vaughan Frazee, R. (2008). E-Coaching in Organizations: A Study of Features, Practices, And Determinants of Use. California, USA. Doctor of Education. University of San Diego. [https://doi.org/10.22371/05.2008.002]
Weiss, M.P., Regan, K.S., & Glaser, H.D. (2020). A Case Study of the Development of an eCoach. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 9(1), 1-17. [https://doi:10.58729/2167-3454.1097]
Wise, D & Cavazos, B. (2017). Leadership coaching for principals: a national study. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 25(2), 1-23. [https://doi:10.1080/13611267.2017.1327690]
Zia Ul Haq, K., Rizwana, R., Aamir, R., & Salma, A. (2023). Criteria for assessing and ensuring the trustworthiness in qualitative research. International Journal of Business Reflections, 4(2), 150- 173. [https://doi:10.56249/ijbr.03.01.44]. 
Zimmer, W. K., & Matthews, Sh. D. (2022). A virtual coaching model of professional development to increase teachers' digital learning competencies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 1-16. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103544].
رهبری آموزشی کاربردی
دوره 7، شماره 1
اردیبهشت 1405
صفحه 52-72

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 09 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 17 دی 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 25 دی 1404

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار